Viral copyleft license for software

A major difference between the set of permissive and copyleft freesoftware licenses is that when the software is being redistributed either modified or unmodified, permissive licenses do not force the redistributor to open the modified source code. Explore the world of open source, and discover how to choose a licensing model for your app, in this foundations of programming course with attorney and technologist john v. Viral licenses also known as copyleft licenses only allow derivative works modifications and redistribution under the original license. Licensing obligations copyleft or viral requirements copyleft or viral requirements.

Is there a generally accepted anticopyleft clause or. The gnu general public license is often called the gnu gpl for short. It was also the first license to implement the concept of copyleft, guaranteeing that gpled free software cannot become, or take part in, nonfree software. Open source and the eradication of viruses copyleft currents.

Free software licenses that use weak copyleft include the gnu lesser general public license and the mozilla public license. Copyleft license means any license that requires, as a condition of use, modification or distribution of a work of authorship, that such work of authorship or derivative works thereof be made available free of charge under such license, and that, in the case of software, be made available in source code form, or under terms that allow such software to be reverse engineered. It is in tune with stallmans vision that software ought to be everdynamic. It achieves this by mandating that any further modification to the copyleft licensed source should be distributed on a similar copyleft license terms. Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 334663 code license managed by kevin. Recent versions contain contract clauses similar to the open software license, and should be avoided for the same reasons. Copyleft denotes a type of foss license that prevents, through license terms, the proprietization of foss code. An example of a free software license that uses strong copyleft is the gnu general public license. A tale of two copyleft licenses while determining the proper methodology and criteria to yield an accurate count remains difficult, the gpl is generally considered one of the most widely used free software licenses.

Dobbs journal, stating that software could be copyleft. Viral license is an alternative name for copyleft licenses, especially the gpl, that allows. Learn all about the history of open source copyleft licenses, what they. This mandate usually gives the incorrect impression to the initial observer that copyleft licenses are restrictive or viral in. Detractors call the open source licenses viral because they see. When an open source software project is published with a copyleft license. The problem for traditional proprietary software distributors gets worse from there. The central idea of copyleft is that we give everyone permission to run the program, copy the program, modify the program, and distribute modified versions but. A major difference between the set of permissive and copyleft free software licenses is that when the software is being redistributed either modified or unmodified, permissive licenses do not force the redistributor to open the modified source code.

Although the gpl is primarily intended for software programs, it is worded so as to apply to many different kinds of works. The design science license is a strong copyleft license that can apply to any work not only software or documentation, but also to literature, artworks, music, photography, and video. The analyzer has detected a file marked with a copyleft license which requires. This event will provide a friendly and safe place for discussion of all aspects of copyleft, including as a key strategy for defending software freedom. Copyleft is a type of license that attempts to ensure that the public retains the freedom to use, modify, extend and redistribute a creative work and all derivative works i. Copyleft is a distinguishing feature of some free software licenses.

The academic free license is a free software license, not copyleft, and incompatible with the gnu gpl. The different licenses also matter when you want to publish your own code as opensource and you are deciding which license you should use. The use of software licenses for non software work is generally discouraged. Most copylefted software is issued under the gnu general public license gpl, which was the first copyleft license and by far the most commonly used license for free software. The source code files will usually contain a copy of the license terms and acknowledge the authors. A is a legal process used by creators and inventors to protect their work and to control distribution of their product. Open source software legal issues, risks and opportunities. X11 license, is a very permissive non copyleft license that allows everyone to basically use the solicensed code for whatever you want as long as you keep the message, and know that the software comes without warranty of any kind. Conservancy is one of the few organizations currently working on enforcement of the gpl, the worlds most popular copyleft license. The gnu free documentation license fdl is a form of copyleft intended for use on a manual. Copyleft licensing is favourable for software coders. Apr 03, 2017 the gnu general public license gpl, originally written by richard stallman, was the first software copyleft license to see extensive use, and continues to dominate in that area. A copyleft license is one that requires, as a condition of distribution of software binaries or in the case of licenses like agpl, a lower threshold such as making them available via a network, that the distributor make the corresponding source code available under the same licensing terms.

That said, the copyleft gplv3 license is still the third most popular open source license out there, and overall, copyleft licenses account for nearly 40% of the open source licenses in use. At the contrary, weak copyleft would refer to licenses that are generally used for the creation of software libraries where not all derived works. But the requiring of the first two isnt enough to make it copyleft. Opensource licenses may allow you to redistribute the software or derived works. Gpl was the first copyleft license for general use. Copyleft also provides an incentive for other programmers to add to free software. Opensource licenses allow software to be freely used, modified, or shared, while respecting the original programmers authorship and intent.

Whats the difference between permissive and copyleft. Licensing obligations copyleft or viral requirements. Any wording to exclude copyleft licenses would probably also exclude any other open source licenses, so that your software would only be usable either in projects using the same license or in closedsource projects. The internet provides a suitable platform for sharing and developing source code and open collaboration results in faster and more efficient development. Gpl could force proprietary software to become free software, but could. The gpl was a trailblazer at the start of the open source revolution and is a prime example of the copyleft or viral license. In the gnu project, the specific distribution terms that we use for most software are contained in the gnu general public license. Strong copyleft licenses go a step further from weak copyleft licenses and mandate that any distributed software that links or otherwise incorporates such code be licensed under compatible licenses, which are a subset of the available opensource licenses. Open source software is software licensed a with its source code.

Oct 24, 2019 while the copyleft license used to be the most common open source license in use, over the past few years weve seen a decline in copyleft license use and a rise in permissive licenses. Considering open source components comprise between 60%80% of todays software, chances are youre using a copyleft license and need to know what that. The vpl is designed to achieve and extend the gpls strong copyleft without the burden of its obligations and restrictions. So instead of putting gnu software in the public domain, we copyleft it. In other words, the code is free to use, to share and modify but any resultant works must be distributed under the same license. This is why people sometimes prefer non copyleft license, depending on the work and the kind of practices they want to encourage.

As an example of viral licensing outside software, after it was revealed that french author michel houellebecq plagiarized sections of wikipedia articles. As a result, these licenses have been called viral. We provide below is a little explanation of copyleft versus non. These licenses require that you share any source code of software that you. Typically, a copyleft license is used for a free, community edition, and a commercial license is used for a socalled enterprise edition. When users incorporate a component licensed under one of the gpl licenses, they must release its source code, as well. It was created by michael stutz after his interest in applying gnustyle copyleft to non software works, which later came to be called open content. The opensource license usually known as mit license, a.

It was created by michael stutz after his interest in applying gnustyle copyleft to nonsoftware works, which later came to be called open content. The mpls filelevel copyleft is designed to encourage contributors to share modifications they make to your code, while still allowing them to. Sharealike is a synonym of copyleft in the creative commons vocabulary. Copyleft garantiert, dass jeder nutzer freiheit hat. That is the basis of dual licensing, a model used by mysql and magento to great effect for building profitable, sustainable businesses. The design science license is a strong copyleft license that can apply to any worknot only software or documentation, but also to literature, artworks, music, photography, and video. Copyleft licenses include several common opensource and free content licenses, such as the gnu general public license g. Alternately, a document can be copylefted under different, or much simpler terms.

Viral license is a pejorative name for copyleft licenses. Mar 14, 2019 the design science license is a strong copyleft license that can apply to any work not only software or documentation, but also to literature, artworks, music, photography, and video. Copyleft licenses for software require that information necessary for reproducing and modifying the work must be made available to recipients of the binaries. Copyleft is a general concept, and you cant use a general concept directly. The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. This later developed into what is known as general public license gpl and states that work. Copyleft licenses are licenses that require redistributed copies and derivative works to be under the same license. In 1976 the term copyleft was used for the first time in dr. Jan 26, 2018 the bestknown copyleft license is the general public license, or gpl, from the free software foundation. Viral license is an alternative name for copyleft licenses, especially the gpl, that allows derivative works only when permissions are preserved in modified versions of the work. Ensuing copyleft provisions stated that when modified versions of free software are distributed, they must be distributed under the same terms as the original software. Copyleft uses law, but flips it over to serve the opposite of its usual purpose.

This is a permissive non copyleft free software license. The free software licenses written by richard stallman in the mid1980s pioneered a concept known as copyleft. We have designed this license in order to use it for manuals for free software, because free software needs free documentation. The gnu free documentation license is another example of a copyleft non software license. Gnu general public license gpl gnu affero public license agpl non. A license threat group for identifying situations where sonatype has been unable to determine the license of a component. Free software is software whose source code is freely available to anyone to use for any purpose, including studying, copying, modifying, extending and giving away. The license issued with the software in the latters original state assumes a sort of omnibus form. If the copyleft software becomes part of a larger software product, and the licensee distributes that product, it has to distribute the whole thing as. These requirements are either some of the most onerous in the open source world, or they are the reason open source has flourished. After opting into the copyleft licence, the source code is readily available, and it allows others to modify and develop the code. Gnu general public license v3 gpl3 364012 code license managed by kevin.

The bestknown copyleft license is the general public license, or gpl, from the free software foundation. In fact, the two models for software licensing open source and proprietary. That said, the copyleft gplv3 license is still the third most popular open source license out there, and overall, copyleft licenses account for nearly 40% of. An example of a copyleft free software license is the often used gnu general public license gpl, also the first copyleft license. Strong copyleft or viral licenses require that you share modifications, but they also require more. Copyleft license legal definition of copyleft license by.

Under a copyleft license, users must do these things under the same license as the original software. Nov 21, 2014 as software developers and publishers, when it comes to integrating third party software, we have to look carefully at the license. This is in distinction to permissive free software licenses, of which the bsd licenses and the mit license are widelyused lessrestrictive examples. Nov 24, 2015 for personal use you may include this software, but as soon as you distribute your modified software it has to use the gpl license meaning you have to make your product opensource and every user will gain the same rights that you had. This license is aimed at giving and protecting all users unlimited freedom to use, study, and privately modify the software, and if the user adheres to the terms and conditions of the gpl, freedom to redistribute. You would be able to without fear do everything you want with the software and binaries e. In the mouth of the gnu gpl license opponents, such notion of strong copyleft became quickly synonym of viral licensing, referring to the hypothesis that any work touching a copyleft work or interfacing with it via linking becomes a kind of derivative and must preserve the copyleft permissions when distributed. Many free software licenses are not copyleft licenses because they do not require the licensee to distribute derivative works under the same license. Various licenses and comments about them gnu project. A weak copyleft license, such as the gnu lesser gpl, applies only to the original copylefted work. Copyleft licenses are both free and open source licenses, but not all licenses that are free software or open source licenses are copyleft. Whats the difference between permissive and copyleft licenses.

For most of its history for 16 years from june 1991 to june 2007 there was really only one version of the gpl, version 2. Even the free software foundation fsf, although the major advocate of copyleft licenses, suggests that, in some circumstances, a strong copyleft license may not be the best choice. Copyleft licenses enforce the publication of the source code under the copyleft license. The gpl is a copyleft license, which means that derivative work must be opensource and distributed under the same or equivalent license terms. Apr 18, 20 in practice, software that is subject to copyleft is offered to licensees in source code form under a license that is commonly described as viral like the general public license or gpl. Such copyleft licenses are called viral license because of their. It may be free software for the person receiving a copy initially, but it cannot be free software after that, because freedom 3 is prohibited from that point onwards in the distribution chain. Free software licenses can be divided into two broad categories. In general, permissive open source licenses and copyleft open source licenses both try to maximize freedom. Jun 24, 2006 most copylefted software is issued under the gnu general public license gpl, which was the first copyleft license and by far the most commonly used license for free software. If someone releases a novel under a copyleft license, and random house prints it and makes a profit off the authors work, theres nothing wrong with this as long as the copyleft is passed down. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a programto make. To be free means to be open to commercial appropriation, since freedom is defined as the nonrestrictive circulation of information rather than as. In particular, the article explores from a theoretical point of view the comparative properties of the two main categories of oss license copyleft and non copyleft licensesin terms of their.

The gnu general public license gpl, originally written by richard stallman, was the first software copyleft license to see extensive use, and continues to dominate in that area. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the mpl. Those key concepts that modified versions must also be under the same license, and that the rights to use, modify, and share the work must be passed on to anyone that gets a copy is what copyleft is all about. Since our products are commercial and not free our code is closed, we only integrate third party software that have noncopyleft license. Jul 29, 2016 copyleft licensing is favourable for software coders. Unfortunately, using the word viral to describe this concept is misleading, and leads to unnecessary fears. In all the years i have been advising clients in this area of law, the single most significant misconception about copyleft licenses is due, i think, to the. There is an ongoing debate as to which class of license provides the greater degree of freedom.

There are variations, of coursethe lgpl, for example, is a weak copyleft. Copyleft strong copyleft licenses go a step further from weak copyleft licenses and mandate that any distributed software that links or otherwise incorporates such code be licensed under compatible licenses, which are a subset of the available opensource licenses. Please note that, while this faq is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation. They cannot, for example, take a gpllicensed piece of software and release it. Copyleft licenses include gpl, lgpl, mpl, epl, and a smattering of others. Considering open source components comprise between 60%80% of todays software, chances are youre using a copyleft license and need to know what that means. Copyleft licenses include several common opensource and free content licenses, such as the gnu general public license gpl and the creative commons attributionsharealike license ccbysa. For example, for software libraries, the fsf suggests using the lesser gpl, which is often described as a weak copyleft license, because it allows interaction with. The third license is a standard, copyleft compliant license.

Basically, it depends on the license of the used software and the intended license for the final product. Free software licenses that mandate that source code that descended from software licensed under them, will remain under the same, weak copyleft, license. Copyleft says that anyone who redistributes the software, with or without changes, must pass along the freedom to further copy and change it. The paper examines intricacies of copyleft licenses, focussing in detail upon the criticisms levelled against it by proponents of proprietary software essentially. This file is marked with copyleft license, which requires you. The vpls sole restriction is its own viral continuity, allowing it to effectively and permanently infect any work it touches with absolute permissiveness. Examples of non copyleft free software licenses include the q public license, the x11 license, and the bsd licenses. Copyleft licenses are sometimes even considered to be nonfree because of the restrictions for redistribution of the works.

223 997 357 266 519 1451 154 1235 538 167 598 531 1245 510 1102 212 1291 879 1302 1425 1454 609 355 536 855 1357 1024 1432 1348 21